Spax also stopped making Jaguar shocks due to the failiure rate.
Help, I still have a Spax on my L/ning, Been on the Comet for a while, Works well and no leaks, Can't remember how many years I have had it. Cheers Bill.Spax also stopped making Jaguar shocks due to the failiure rate.
Thanks for putting me straight on the springs. I just assumed that because the diameter of the coils varied, the spring rate would rise. That will teach me not to assume!Hello John, we seem to have followed very much the same line of thinking and come to similar conclusions. However I have to disagree with you over the standard springs being rising rate. I was unsure just by looking at them, so I asked AVO to put one in their test rig. We found the spring rate was constant throughout the springs range of movement at 204 lb/inch.
Greg, about three years ago I fitted a twin disc front set-up. The only difference is it now stops much better. As far as I am aware it is otherwise standard, vincent shock home made seals, filled with auto trans fluid. For a 66 year old bike I find the suspension unremarkable, except the rear on big bumps. This may be due to 40 years with americas finest. Relax, the last harley got sold a while ago, the vin is far superior.It Surprises me that after all these discussions about steering stem changes and bad handling issues, that some of you who have much better brakes, such as discs have not commented about whether this has increased the chance of the front suspension behaving badly. I would have thought that having good brakes would only highlight the problem and make it far worse........Anyone share their experience........
What's on the back Roy, I would have thought 100/90/19 would be enough,With maybe a 110 on the back, I made a big mistake years ago, A tyre man told me to fit 2 tyres, The front one was a different shape to the rear and was wider than the back one, Even though the size was marked smaller. Cheers Bill.I say unremarkable because it does nothing frightening or uncomfortable. Maybe I spend too much time looking where I'm going. I have a bit of an idea that the 5" speedo mount acts as a limit stop as the paint on it and the forks keeps chipping off. The only time the forks stiffen is sticking it into a roundabout at a fair pace, now I'm expecting it , it does not appear to cause any trouble. I did however make a mistake when fitting the front wheel, Phil Read suggested that a slightly smaller front tyre would "sharpen up" the steering, I put a 90/90 19 on. It worked, but at 80 plus mph in crosswinds it gets nervous. 110/90 19 come spring time will correct this. Because it aint broke I am leaving it alone. Basically I like it compared with the 14 harleys I had previous.
When he said smaller did he mean thinner? Racing little Ducatis and Suzukis in the '70s there was a tendency to put massive 3.50 rear tyres and 3.25 front on them. An international racing guy said I was going the wrong way and should put a 3.00 or 3.25 (at the most) rear and 2.75-3.0 front. Lap times improved after the change. IMHO 19" front on a standard Vincent is only good for super smooth roads and moderate speed. IF you change the suspension etc. then obviously other things change. I love my 21" front wheel.I say unremarkable because it does nothing frightening or uncomfortable. Maybe I spend too much time looking where I'm going. I have a bit of an idea that the 5" speedo mount acts as a limit stop as the paint on it and the forks keeps chipping off. The only time the forks stiffen is sticking it into a roundabout at a fair pace, now I'm expecting it , it does not appear to cause any trouble. I did however make a mistake when fitting the front wheel, Phil Read suggested that a slightly smaller front tyre would "sharpen up" the steering, I put a 90/90 19 on. It worked, but at 80 plus mph in crosswinds it gets nervous. 110/90 19 come spring time will correct this. Because it aint broke I am leaving it alone. Basically I like it compared with the 14 harleys I had previous.