ET: Engine (Twin) Mk3 cams - timing figures

greg brillus

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Actually drilling holes to lighten anything is a very old practice that does very little to remove much weight at all, unless the holes are very large.......At what point does this become a weakness.........You only find out at the track when something fails. These days with CNC machines you can machine sections of a part away which gives much better results to remove weight and less chance of failure. That is how I kept the weight down on the racer I built and done similar to the 1200 Norvin racer I have just finished. I was never quite sure of the weight of the racer when finished, but recently Phil told me that when it was in the Horner's workshop on the scales it came in at about 155 kg's ........I was pleasantly surprised. Cheers............Greg.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

timetraveller

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Referencing posting 17 above; the figure of 0.205" came from reading off the original graph in Excel where it can be enlarged so that it is easy to read the figures more accurately. I was also aware of the extra height on the exhaust lift when compared with the inlet but whether it was deliberate or not I do not know.
 

fogrider

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
My cams were supplied by that well known and very helpful IOW specialist , Gary Robinson, to Maughans who fitted them onto new camwheels. I feel sure they must be the very same cams.
I love the pic of Robert Watsons bench. Home from home !. My bench is well cluttered, someone once told it was because I had too many hammers, I count 5 ball peins' on Roberts bench, I'm in very good company !
Regards, Terry.
 

fogrider

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
My son often reminds me of something I told him when he started working on his own bikes 20 odd years ago -" Hammers are for delivering major force in the most careful manner"
Invaluable, and I do like your bench Robert, especially the engine on it , envious ? me ?
 

Robert Watson

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Now to really hijack the thread, here is another picture of the same bench a few years ago.

Copy of IMG_2442.JPG
 

Phil Davies

Well Known and Active Forum User
Non-VOC Member
Phil's comment was proved to be true with the spintron work of top motorcycle drag racers. The fly wheel and gears that were lightened caused visible valve bounce.
David

At the risk of being declared very, very thick (a frequent occurance!!) can someone explain to me (simply) how a light flywheel/cam drive causes valve bounce - surely valve bounce is a function of the associated cam profile, valve gear strength and valve spring as the valve accelleration/decelleration is only allowed to randomly vary by the amount of backlash in the camshaft drive chain.
What plainly obvious point am I missing?
 

Phil Davies

Well Known and Active Forum User
Non-VOC Member
Hiding in plain sight! So Desmo rules then! Thank you David.
That would imply that you need a different cam profile for each compression ratio change.
PS you have PM and emails.
 
Top